Where's William Tyrrell?

32

On the 12th of September 2014, three-year-old William Tyrrell disappeared from the yard of his foster grandmother’s house in the quiet town of Kendall, New South Wales.

A search and rescue mission soon became an investigation into his likely abduction, but who took him?

Was the kidnapping planned or an opportunistic crime? Are we any closer to knowing what happened to William today than we were almost five years ago?

10 News First's Lia Harris and Natarsha Belling go through the entire story and strive to answer the question…Where’s William Tyrrell?


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Recent Episodes
Episodes loading...
Recent Reviews
  • idsjsdx
    Very biased
    I’m absolutely convinced the foster parents could pull the body out of hiding and these podcasters still would defend them.
  • vmns2021
    As I mentioned before...obviously...
    I never suspected the foster parents until I listened to this podcast. The hosts bend over backwardsso far to make them look good, you'd think they are on their payroll. Foster parents are textbook narcissists and show clear characteristics of psychopathy. Finally, I challenged anyone to find ONE - and I mean ONE single response from the host Lia Harris that doesn't include the phrase "As I mentioned before AND "obviously". How does no one tell her how annoying that is?? EVERY. SINGLE. RESPONSE. So freakin annoying!
  • Estellacr5
    Drags on
    Repetitive information. Drags on way too long.
  • SDMidwife
    Tried. Had to quit midway through.
    Kept trying to hang In there, but felt like I was wasting my time with so much dead time on air. Could have fit in 2-3 episodes at most. Dragged on excessively.
  • dancer's heart
    Drags on
    Stretched this story over way too many episodes
  • Mr pre
    Not Journalism
    It’s clear you have already gone into the research with a former opinion.
  • Fluffygooey
    Pretty Good
    Interesting but there’s repetition and at times it seems to drag. I found myself hanging on, waiting for the next real detail of the story. You will hear “we’ll come back to that at a later episode” about 100 times. I think the story is quite a mystery, very moving and sad. I do think this could have been condensed to 2 or 3 episodes.
  • Sasha917
    Really well done
    Very well done and respectful towards both families.
  • Mrsmrfab
    Meh
    The reporters know their stuff but this case is just not compelling. It’s more about what they DON’T say rather than the content itself. It contains some interviews with the custodial parents but not the birth parents, so it lacks the emotional pull. I just couldn’t connect with the custodial parents - mostly because their parts were played by actors and in the real interviews they did play, they seemed distant. We don’t even know their real names - not that I would know anyway - but it’s just another example of them being at arm’s length from us. They play the (911) call and say how emotional and scared she sounded. Not to me. It just sounded like a neighbor calling and not a distraught parent. (I don’t believe they did it - this is just an example of how there is no feeling or emotion to grab me as a listener.) Even more maddening - in every episode, the one reporter mentions some tidbit but then says “we’ll talk about that in a later episode” ... ok ... how about you not mention it or you at least address a small part to satisfy our curiosity in the moment and also whet our appetite for the later podcast ...? There is no resolution so there is no satisfaction at the end either. This is just a story with a middle and no real beginning or ending.
Similar Podcasts
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork on this page are property of the podcast owner, and not endorsed by UP.audio.