Uncharted with Hannah Fry

Hannah Fry follows the numbers on thrilling journeys of data and discovery. Along the way we meet the remarkable people who dug into the data and unearthed something extraordinary.

Recent Episodes
  • 20. The Confidence Trick
    Sep 9, 2024 – 17:39
  • 19. A Different Kind of Justice
    Sep 9, 2024 – 14:06
  • 18. The Night the Earth Shook
    Sep 9, 2024 – 17:11
  • 17. The Golden Spike
    Sep 9, 2024 – 15:52
  • 16. A Drop in the Ocean
    Sep 9, 2024 – 16:14
  • 15. Song of the Sea
    Sep 9, 2024 – 14:52
  • 14. Whispers from the Cosmos
    Sep 9, 2024 – 15:31
  • 13. The Grain of Truth
    Sep 9, 2024 – 15:06
  • 12. Scandal in the Air
    Sep 9, 2024 – 15:05
  • 11. Love Bytes
    Sep 9, 2024 – 17:35
  • Introducing... Uncharted with Hannah Fry Series 2
    Sep 2, 2024 – 02:05
  • 10. Devil in the Detail
    Oct 2, 2023 – 14:44
  • 9. Access Denied
    Oct 2, 2023 – 14:10
  • 8. In the Habit
    Oct 2, 2023 – 14:14
  • 7. The Gossip Mill
    Oct 2, 2023 – 13:48
  • 6. The Happiness Curve
    Oct 2, 2023 – 13:50
  • 5. The Choice
    Sep 25, 2023 – 14:48
  • 4. This Train Has Been Delayed
    Sep 25, 2023 – 13:29
  • 3. The Doctor Will See You Now
    Sep 25, 2023 – 14:10
  • 2. The Hockey Stick
    Sep 25, 2023 – 13:59
  • 1. The Returning Soldier
    Sep 25, 2023 – 14:31
  • Introducing... Uncharted with Hannah Fry
    Sep 18, 2023 – 00:46
Recent Reviews
  • Dogwood 1
    Correlation does not mean causation
    Some of the conclusions made are week and assumes all variables have been accounted for. In at least one case the data the episode is based on had been proven faulty years before the recording of the podcast. It was well edited, well produced, and the presenter was pleasant to listen to.
  • etherdog
    Not the best effort
    Obviously someone else wrote this, and it is pretty bad. Rutherford and Frye is much more interesting and useful.
  • Karuna Star
    Uncharted
    I absolutely adore Hannah Frye & her work! Sure some of the points get repeated rather often, but she’s a teacher so I understand why she does it. When is the next session coming out??!!
  • Nitram99
    Repetitive
    Lots of awe and wonder on the part of the presenter. But everything is stated two or three times. In a fourteen minute show that means not much gets covered.
  • The Nameless Twin
    Watch for cognitive cognitive bias
    I love Hannah Fry and am very much looking forward to more of this podcast. That said, I go in aware that she is subject to a few logical fallacies, such as the false dichotomy. In the introductory episode she mentions that the original observation that, after wars, we tend to see a spike in male birth, was chalked up to God helping restore the ideal ratio of males to females. She then dismisses this notion because, well, there’s a scientific explanation. The idea that a god might be the creator of science never occurs to her. God=not science Science=not god In fact, there are a fairly sizable number of religious people who believe in science. My uncle, David A Johnson, professor of Genetics, Cellular & Molecular Biology, and Experimental Genetics at Concordia College, William Jewel College, Emory University, Seinan Gakuin University, and Samford University, where he also held the Chair of the Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences before retiring, was also an ordained minister and spent 25 years in Japan (while teaching evolutionary biology at Seinan Gakuin) as a Christian missionary. The superfluous opinion bits about religion are unnecessary. Just report the science and leave off speculation on topics you don’t know. Perhaps a god built this feature into the human reproductive system.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork on this page are property of the podcast owner, and not endorsed by UP.audio.